Jeff Koons, Apollo and the Transformation of Hydra

In June 2023, I attended the handover ceremony of Jeff Koons’ Apollo Wind Spinner on Hydra following an invitation from Dakis Joannou and the DESTE Foundation. Standing beside Koons as the sculpture was formally gifted to the Municipality of Hydra offered a rare opportunity to witness not simply the unveiling of a public artwork, but the culmination of one of the most enduring artist–collector relationships in contemporary art.

The ceremony secured the permanent presence of Apollo Wind Spinner on the island, ensuring that a work conceived in direct response to Hydra would remain part of its cultural landscape. Yet the significance of the occasion extended well beyond the transfer of ownership. It brought together several histories at once: the friendship between Koons and Joannou, the evolution of the DESTE Foundation, Hydra’s emergence as an important centre for contemporary art, and the continuing power of ancient mythology to acquire new meaning in the present.

Positioned above the former slaughterhouse used by DESTE as its project space, the sculpture is visible from the sea. Its radiating form turns with the wind, catching the changing Aegean light and announcing itself to visitors as they approach the island. First presented as part of Koons’ 2022 exhibition Apollo, the work entered into a wider dialogue between antiquity, contemporary visual culture and the particular history of its setting.

Its permanent installation allows that dialogue to continue long after the exhibition itself has ended.

​

Jeff Koons and Dakis Joannou: A Friendship Shaped by Art

The relationship between Dakis Joannou and Jeff Koons is among the most consequential collector–artist partnerships in contemporary art.

It began in 1985, when Joannou encountered Koons’ One Ball Total Equilibrium Tank in New York. The work presented an ordinary basketball suspended in a tank of distilled water, held in a state of almost impossible balance. At once familiar and strangely remote, it transformed an object associated with aspiration, competition and popular culture into an image of suspension and perfection.

Joannou was sufficiently intrigued to visit Koons’ studio and acquire the work. The purchase became foundational to his collection, but its greater significance lay in the relationship that followed. Over nearly four decades, Joannou remained one of Koons’ most committed supporters and interlocutors.

The word collector can sometimes suggest a primarily acquisitive role: someone who identifies, purchases and possesses objects. The most important collections, however, are rarely formed through a sequence of isolated transactions. They develop through sustained attention, conviction and a willingness to engage with artists before history has settled their reputations.

In this more ambitious understanding of collecting, the collector does not simply confirm an existing consensus. He or she helps create the conditions in which cultural significance can emerge. That does not mean directing an artist’s work or substituting patronage for critical judgment. It means providing continuity, confidence and intellectual engagement over time.

The relationship between Joannou and Koons exemplifies this form of commitment. It has endured changing fashions, critical controversy, extraordinary market success and the transformation of the contemporary art world itself. Their friendship has been shaped not merely by ownership, but by recurring conversation and a shared belief in the cultural potential of art.

Koons has since become one of the defining and most contested artists of his generation. His works have entered major museum collections, broken auction records and become embedded in popular consciousness. Yet to understand the relationship between Joannou and Koons through market value alone would be to miss its deeper importance. Joannou’s engagement began long before Koons’ position in contemporary art was secure.

That distinction matters. Patronage is most culturally valuable when it involves conviction before certainty.

​

The DESTE Foundation and a Different Model of Patronage

Founded by Dakis Joannou in 1983, the DESTE Foundation has played a central role in bringing international contemporary art into dialogue with audiences in Greece.

Its significance lies not only in the stature of the artists with whom it has worked, but in the institutional model it represents. Unlike a conventional museum, DESTE is not primarily defined by the preservation and display of a permanent collection in chronological order. Its identity has developed through exhibitions, commissions, publications and collaborations that treat contemporary art as a living field rather than a history already concluded.

That flexibility has allowed the foundation to create encounters that feel experimental rather than predetermined. Established artists can appear alongside younger practices; historical references can be placed in unexpected proximity to contemporary culture; and the exhibition itself can become a form of inquiry.

The Slaughterhouse Project Space on Hydra is perhaps the clearest expression of this philosophy.

The building is a former abattoir positioned above the sea. Its rough architecture, isolation and physical history remain inseparable from the works presented within it. It is neither a neutral white cube nor a grand institutional monument. Any artistic intervention must contend with the weight of the site.

The annual projects staged there have helped establish Hydra as one of the most distinctive destinations on the international contemporary art calendar. Artists, collectors, curators, writers and museum directors gather on the island each summer, but the atmosphere differs markedly from that of an art fair or a metropolitan opening.

Hydra has no cars. Movement is slower, and distances are experienced on foot, by boat or on horseback. Conversations continue beyond the exhibition space: around the harbour, over dinner, on the paths above the town or during the crossing from Athens. The formal encounter with art becomes part of a wider social and geographical experience.

This is not incidental. Art does not acquire meaning only through the object itself. It is also shaped by architecture, landscape, conversation, memory and the people assembled around it.

Hydra provides an unusually concentrated form of this cultural ecology. Its relative remoteness does not isolate it from contemporary life. Instead, it creates conditions in which contemporary art can be experienced differently.

 

Why Apollo?

The title Apollo introduces one of the richest and most complex figures in Greek mythology.

Apollo is often described simply as the god of light, music and poetry, but this familiar summary captures only part of his meaning. He was also associated with prophecy, healing, purification, archery, measure and civic order. At Delphi, his oracle was consulted on private, political and military questions. In visual culture, he was often represented with the lyre or kithara, instruments connecting him with music, disciplined form and artistic inspiration.

His identity was not entirely benign. Apollo could heal, but he could also bring disease. He represented clarity and harmonious order, yet his arrows could strike suddenly from afar. He purified contamination while remaining capable of punishment.

These apparent contradictions are fundamental to his power.

Apollo is therefore not merely a decorative symbol of sunshine or classical beauty. He embodies the possibility that order can emerge from danger, that restoration can follow rupture, and that artistic form can give structure to otherwise unruly forces.

Even the origin of his name remains uncertain. The Greek form, Apollōn, has resisted definitive explanation. One older theory connected it with the Doric apella, meaning an assembly, which would associate Apollo with civic organisation and communal life. Other scholars have suggested that the name may be pre-Greek or Anatolian in origin, perhaps linked to a deity recorded in Hittite sources.

The etymology remains unresolved, but that uncertainty is itself revealing. Apollo was never a figure with one fixed meaning. His identity developed across regions, cults and historical periods. Different communities emphasised different attributes, while poets and artists repeatedly reinterpreted him.

Myth survived through transformation.

Apollo was also known as Phoebus Apollo: the radiant or shining Apollo. His association with the sun became increasingly prominent over time, although Apollo and Helios were originally distinct deities. Later traditions brought them closer together, strengthening Apollo’s connection with light, illumination and revelation.

This distinction adds depth to Koons’ choice. His Apollo is solar, but not simply because it resembles the sun. Its radiating form draws on a much broader cultural history in which light signifies knowledge, purification, artistic inspiration and the disciplined visibility of things.

 

The Apollonian and the Dionysian

The modern understanding of Apollo was profoundly shaped by Friedrich Nietzsche’s distinction between the Apollonian and the Dionysian.

For Nietzsche, Apollo represented form, measure, individuation and the creation of intelligible images. Dionysus represented intoxication, excess, dissolution and the collapse of boundaries between the individual and the collective.

The value of Greek tragedy, in Nietzsche’s account, lay not in the victory of one principle over the other, but in the tension between them.

This offers a useful way of thinking about Koons.

His surfaces often appear emphatically Apollonian. They are technically controlled, immaculate, reflective and resistant to accident. They promise a world in which disorder has been eliminated. Industrial fabrication becomes a means of achieving a precision beyond the unaided hand.

Yet the experience created by those surfaces is far less stable. The viewer appears within them, distorted and absorbed. Surrounding architecture, light and movement become part of the object. The apparent perfection of the sculpture produces a continuously changing image.

Koons’ work therefore does not simply impose order. It stages the encounter between order and flux.

Apollo Wind Spinner makes that encounter unusually explicit. Its form is precisely engineered, but its visible life depends on motion. It suggests permanence, while its shifting orientation ensures that it is never encountered in precisely the same state.

The Apollonian form contains a Dionysian world of movement, weather, reflection and human presence.

 

Koons and the Persistence of Antiquity

Koons is often reduced in public discussion to a small number of instantly recognisable images: balloon animals, polished steel surfaces and enlarged objects drawn from popular culture.

That account overlooks the sustained importance of antiquity and art history throughout his practice.

Koons does not approach the past with reverence from a safe historical distance. He treats ancient, Renaissance and Baroque forms as images that continue to circulate in the present. They coexist with advertising, toys, souvenirs, luxury goods and digital reproductions.

For Koons, the past is not sealed away. It remains part of contemporary visual experience.

This was especially evident in his Gazing Ball works, in which reflective blue spheres were placed in relation to canonical paintings and sculptures. The sphere inserted the viewer into the historical image, collapsing the distance between the work of the past, the contemporary object and the present-day spectator.

His Antiquity series similarly brought classical imagery into contact with reflective surfaces, drawing and symbols derived from modern popular culture. Rather than preserving antiquity as an untouchable ideal, Koons treated it as a living repository of forms, desires and cultural memory.

Apollo Wind Spinner belongs within this trajectory.

The sculpture does not imitate an ancient statue or reconstruct a lost object. Instead, it translates Apollo into the language of contemporary public sculpture: kinetic, reflective, technologically engineered and immediately accessible.

This is important. Koons is not attempting to return to antiquity. He is asking what antiquity can become after Pop art, mass reproduction and the transformation of the image into a globally circulating commodity.

His Apollo is at once ancient deity, monumental sculpture and enlarged version of an object associated with gardens, decoration and popular leisure. The distance between the sacred and the familiar is deliberately narrowed.

That movement is characteristic of Koons. He does not generally ask viewers to reject pleasure, ornament or familiarity in order to reach a supposedly higher cultural realm. Instead, he challenges the hierarchy separating ordinary desire from aesthetic experience.

 

Making the Invisible Visible

The wind spinner is central to the sculpture’s meaning.

Wind cannot be seen directly. It becomes perceptible only through its effects: moving water, bending trees, shifting fabric or rotating metal. By responding to the air, the sculpture gives visible form to an invisible force.

This gives Apollo Wind Spinner a dependence unusual for a monumental public object. Although carefully engineered and materially substantial, it is not entirely autonomous. Its appearance is completed by the conditions around it.

The work requires wind, light, landscape and spectators.

When it turns, the sculpture registers the atmosphere of the island. Its movement is neither wholly natural nor wholly mechanical. Natural force and technological control meet within the same object.

That relationship complicates the idea of permanence. The work is permanently installed, yet its visible state is always temporary. Each encounter is conditioned by the hour, the weather, the direction of the light and the position of the viewer.

In this sense, the sculpture is both monument and event.

Its radiating form is visible from the approach to Hydra. For visitors arriving by sea, it performs a function traditionally associated with markers, signals and sacred images positioned above a settlement. It announces a place while simultaneously changing one’s perception of it.

The former slaughterhouse below acquires a new profile. The coastline is subtly altered. An image associated with Apollo, illumination and artistic creation rises above a building historically connected with death and physical violence.

That contrast is difficult to ignore.

The work does not erase the building’s former function. It places it into tension with ideas of purification, renewal and transcendence. Its meaning therefore comes not only from what it represents, but from where it stands.

 

Hydra as a Cultural Landscape

Hydra already possessed a powerful artistic mythology before Koons’ arrival. Its landscape and social life have attracted writers, musicians and artists for generations. DESTE has added a new contemporary layer to that history.

The result is not simply cultural tourism. Hydra has become a place in which art, social exchange and landscape reinforce one another.

The absence of cars contributes to this effect, but so does the island’s architectural integrity. Contemporary works do not appear against a generic urban backdrop. They encounter stone paths, whitewashed buildings, working boats, steep terrain and an ever-present sea.

In such a setting, the introduction of a major artwork carries risks. It can appear imposed, promotional or indifferent to local character. Scale alone does not create significance, and an artist’s international reputation does not guarantee that a work will belong to a place.

The eventual acceptance of Apollo Wind Spinner by the local community therefore matters. The decision to retain the sculpture permanently reflected more than institutional ambition. It acknowledged that the work had begun to form part of Hydra’s public image and daily environment.

This is how cultural identity evolves. It is not preserved by preventing all change, but neither is it enriched by every intervention. The most successful additions enter into a meaningful relationship with what already exists.

Koons’ sculpture does so through its imagery, position and movement. Apollo belongs to the historical imagination of Greece, but this is not a historicising monument. The work speaks in a contemporary visual language while allowing ancient meanings to remain present.

 

Public Art and Collective Memory

The permanent gift of Apollo Wind Spinner raises a broader question: what can public sculpture still accomplish?

A work in a private collection is encountered under controlled conditions and by a limited audience. A museum object is publicly accessible, but it remains framed by the conventions of institutional display. Public sculpture enters a different order of experience.

It is encountered intentionally and accidentally. Some people seek it out; others pass it while attending to entirely different aspects of their lives. It becomes a meeting point, a landmark, a controversy, a backdrop and a memory.

Residents do not experience such a work only once. They see it across years and seasons. Children grow up in its presence. Visitors associate it with their experience of a place. It enters photographs, stories and personal recollection.

Over time, a work may cease to feel like an intervention and become part of the landscape.

That does not mean public art must be universally liked. Consensus is neither a reliable measure of artistic quality nor a necessary condition for cultural importance. But a public work must sustain repeated encounter. It must remain capable of generating attention after the novelty of installation has passed.

Apollo Wind Spinner has particular advantages in this respect. Its movement prevents it from becoming entirely static, while the changing light of Hydra continually alters its appearance. Its visibility from the sea allows it to function as a marker of arrival, but its symbolic complexity prevents it from becoming merely decorative.

It links Hydra to a larger international history of public art without severing the work from the island’s own cultural inheritance.

 

The Meaning of the Handover

At the handover ceremony in June 2023, the sculpture’s transition from temporary exhibition work to permanent public presence was formally acknowledged.

Standing beside Jeff Koons, Dakis Joannou and representatives of the Municipality of Hydra, what struck me was that the occasion felt less like the conclusion of an exhibition than the visible expression of a relationship developed over nearly forty years.

The ceremony celebrated a work of art, but it also revealed the network of commitment required to bring such a work into being and allow it to remain.

Artists create, but major cultural projects are rarely achieved by artists alone. They depend on patrons willing to support long-term ambition, institutions able to create appropriate contexts, civic authorities prepared to assume responsibility and communities willing to incorporate new forms into shared space.

When these relationships function well, patronage becomes more than private enthusiasm. It acquires a public dimension.

The gift of Apollo Wind Spinner transformed an artwork associated with a particular exhibition into part of Hydra’s future. Joannou and DESTE did not simply bring an internationally recognised artist to the island. They enabled the work to enter its civic and cultural life.

That is perhaps the clearest measure of the project’s success.

 

A Lasting Legacy

Apollo Wind Spinner contains several overlapping narratives.

It is a major work by Jeff Koons and an extension of his longstanding engagement with reflection, transformation, art history and the emotional accessibility of familiar forms.

It is also a contemporary reinterpretation of Apollo: not a fixed marble body, but a radiant image animated by wind, technology and light. The ancient god of music, prophecy, purification and measure becomes a continually moving presence above the harbour.

The sculpture reflects the vision of Dakis Joannou and the DESTE Foundation, whose work on Hydra has demonstrated that serious contemporary art need not remain confined to museums, commercial galleries or metropolitan centres.

Above all, it embodies a relationship. The friendship between Joannou and Koons began with a single encounter in New York in 1985 and developed into one of contemporary art’s most sustained dialogues between artist and collector. On Hydra, that private history has produced a public legacy.

This may be the work’s most important transformation.

In an art world frequently preoccupied with auction prices, rankings and the rapid circulation of attention, Apollo Wind Spinner offers a different measure of value. Its meaning lies in duration: the duration of friendship, artistic inquiry, institutional commitment and the work’s continuing presence within the life of the island.

Public art succeeds most fully when it does more than occupy space. It changes the way a place is seen and remembered.

Looking across Hydra’s harbour, Koons’ Apollo is at once ancient and unmistakably contemporary, engineered yet dependent on nature, monumental yet continually changing. It turns above the sea as a symbol of light and artistic creation, but also as evidence of what can emerge when artists, collectors, institutions and communities sustain a shared belief in culture.

It is not simply a sculpture placed on Hydra.

It has become part of how Hydra now presents itself to the world.